=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
Unsung Forum »
Prog Britannia
Log In to post a reply
79 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Jane
Jane
3024 posts

Re: Prog Britannia
Jan 02, 2009, 18:27
zphage wrote:

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2d7eeeba-d14f-11dd-8cc3-000077b07658.html?nclick_check=1

...the emergence of a bold new trend in music-making, which would, for a brief period, dominate the world’s album charts...Prog rock was a deadly serious affair. There was no room for irony...

Here were the essential tenets of prog rock: virtuoso musical skills, applied to any song with limitless indulgence; poetic flights of fancy that turned language into an enemy of meaning; brazen yet leaden showmanship (see Spinal Tap); and extremely long hair.


Gah! Honestly, what a pile of sheer COCK. There really is some prize wank wanked over by musos about 'prog' rock. What, pray, is the problem with being able to play your instrument? And what's wrong with making music that is varied, original, indulgent, has weird time signatures, long symphonic sections, instrumentals lasting 20 minutes or more of big, sweeping tunes and complex instrumentation? And what's FFS is wrong with long hair?

If you (the reviewer, not you zphage!) don't like it, then that's one thing, but it doesn't make it crap or meaningless, it just means it's not to your taste.

For the most part I love 'prog'. It's probably my favorite rock genre. I'm sure the programme tonight will mention ELP, Genesis, Tull, Yes, Camel, and so on but I bet it won't mention my own progtastic heroes: Focus.

So many bands owe so much to prog and it never went away. Not in my world anyway.
In reply to:
Prog Britannia (zphage)		 Replies:
Re: Prog Britannia (Deepinder Cheema)
Re: Prog Britannia (dave clarkson)
Topic Outline:
Unsung Forum Index