Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
U-Know! Forum »
Jeremy Corbyn
Log In to post a reply

229 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
grufty jim
grufty jim
1947 posts

PS .. ... ....
Sep 08, 2015, 17:43
Just struck me that I linked to several analyses and suggested they reached a "near-consensus" but never really explained what that consensus was.

You can - of course - read the pieces yourself... and there are a lot more where they came from. But the basic gist is this:

1. The LibDems shed most of their seats rightwards.

2. The distribution (as opposed to the actual size) of the UKIP vote damaged Labour more than the Tories.

3. There was a perception that the economy was recovering (and people are ansty about changing governments in those circumstances).

4. Most importantly, and perhaps largely responsible for all 3 previous points... Labour failed to offer a coherent alternative to the tories.


There's no way of knowing whether a more leftwing Labour would have done better; but so long as they were offering "austerity light" (to use one of Corbyn's favourite phrases) they could never hope to hit the tories where it hurts.
Topic Outline:

U-Know! Forum Index