Sanctuary wrote:
IF the stone was removed from the WHS that is serious stuff IF it has a direct connection with the WKA.
Roy, have read this thread with interest and was going to made the same point as you. If the stone was taken from within the boundaries of the World Heritage Site then surely English Heritage/National Trust are obliged to sue these people for its return. From the description of its original location its sounds as though it may well belong to the WHS.
|