Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Neanderthals v Humans
Log In to post a reply

137 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Littlestone
Littlestone
5386 posts

Re: Neanderthals v Humans
Nov 05, 2012, 16:35
CianMcLiam wrote:
Paul Pettitt gave a talk at a conference over the weekend and was willing to speculate that some of the earliest phases of cave art could have been made by Neanderthals.
Nicholas Humphreys had a paper a good few years ago comparing some cave paintings with those done by non-verbal people with autism or degenerative brain diseases that resulted in loss of language. He put forward the proposition that the paintings were likely to have been created by pre-modern minds who were more accomplished with visual communication than verbal which could put Neanderthals in the picture (presuming they were non-verbal visual thinkers, which may be completely false). The claim was highly controversial though, and heavily criticised by Bahn, amongst others.


That’s fascinating Cian. The only thing I’d say is that cave painting (unlike outdoor rockart for example) should have a fair bit of organic material (carbon black, and maybe animal fat binders for example) embedded within it - which would (I’m guessing) give a fairly accurate date for their execution. If they could date that organic material to a time when Neanderthals were still around... wow!
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index