Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Neanderthals v Humans
Log In to post a reply

137 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
GLADMAN
950 posts

Re: Scots/Picts/Celts/Romans/Saxons/etc
Nov 03, 2012, 18:47
tiompan wrote:
[Cunliffe suggests an immigrant Anglo -Saxon ratio in the south and east of England of between 1:3 to 1:5 and describes it as “significant” .

The genocide of the Picts was a medieval myth . Most contemporary historians of the period point out the gradual gaelicisation of Pictland long before the accession of Kenneth who may well have been pictish himself and was described at his death as King of Picts . The Dupplin Cross close to the important royal centre of Forteviot has gaelic references to Pictish kings prior to Kenneth . Kenneth's son Causantín , complete with pictish name , was described as King of the Picts which is odd if his father had just destroyed them . Alex Woolf describes Kenneth as “the fifth last of the Pictish kings rather than the first Scottish king."


So why falsify the king lists? Or did that not occur? And why construct foundation myths going back to Brutus etc to convince the pope to support resistance to English claims of suzererainty if the original inhabitants had willingly joined the party. Sounds very much to me of a case of 'the lady doth protest too much, methinks'.

And again, why would a warlike (and apparently rather good at it) people like the Picts willingly adopt another language and renounce their group identity. What was in it for them? These are questions I'd need answered..........
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index