Julian Cope presents Head Heritage | The Modern Antiquarian Forum

Steve Gray

931 posts

Re: Rotation

Aug 30, 2003, 00:22

> So what's wrong with something along my previous idea, tying some logs along the stone and notching them? The notches would effectively hook onto the corner of the tower and the whole thing would pivot round until it fell cleanly.

I like the principle, but the problem is how to fasten the logs to the stone. When the stone reaches the angle at which it would have slipped, it is going to try to slip along the logs. The only thing restraining it is friction. For the block not to slip along the logs the rope has to increase the contact force with the logs to a point that does no exceed limiting friction. For a coefficient of friction of 1 the binding would have to produce 40 tons of pressure between the block and its logs in order to support it at the vertical. I know we dont't need to go that far, but the coefficient is probably less than 1 and we may need to get to 80 degrees or so. Of course 40 turns of rope around the block would mean that the average strain on the rope would only be 1 ton. Do we know what kind of ropes were available at the time and how thick a 1 ton rope of that era would be?

Actually the same argument applies to Gordon's suggestion of using wedged mortice and tenons. Would they be strong enough to increase the frictional force sufficiently?

In reply to:
Re: Rotation (nigelswift)

Replies:
Re: Rotation (GordonP)

The Modern Antiquarian Forum » Stonehenge » Stone Shifting 2	Log In to post a reply

161 messages	Topic View: Flat \| Threaded