Horsedrawn wrote:
There is little point in responding to being called an arrogant big headed know all, but it might help if I were to be asked some particular questions. I will try to answer them; otherwise please pardon my redundancy.
David Kane.
Nobody ever used the term know all about you here .
Why did you deliberately falsify my quote and not respond to the charge , i.e. " I quoted the post I was responding to (re: potentially falsified evidence) " when the actual quote was nothing like that ? Interestingly what you have done is exactly what your imaginary quote implies .
What made you think ,that having complained about the lack of evidence how I could then suggest it was falsified ?
Do you now know what falsifiable means ?
Do you now understand the concept of a control ?
Could you point out where in earlier posts , before the accusation , I used "scathing cynicism, distrust and provocation" ?
You asked " Foggy and Compo aligned on TQ ?" Why didn't you respond to the answer ?
Any comment on the Einstein quote ?
What is the percentage of measurements /"alignments "/orienations or what you might consider salient to the total number of possible measurements etc ?
|