And according to this link: http://www.co2science.org/data/mwp/mwpp.php
There are data published by 859 individual scientists from 511 separate research institutions in 43 different countries (and counting) to support the MWP being warmer than today.
The IPCC is a political organisation who's stated purpose is to look at the effects of AGW. It's not there to look at 'if' there is AGW, it takes AGW as a given. There's no impartiality and they have been proven wrong, time and time again with many embarrasing retractions.
Simply, the IPCC started off biased and will continue. I would prefer unbiased refrences... If yo only look at the IPCC, you'll only get one side of the story.
|