Merrick wrote: stray wrote: Emotion = soul, to put it simply...Yes I'm joking, but just showing how not only it's philosophically possible to argue for the existence of the soul
No it's not. It's redefining the word so that it fits something we can't deny.
:rollseyes: Yes, of course, please reread the first paragraph as to what a radical argument is. We do similar things in maths & physics all the time. The fact that we spend a lot more time arguing on a proof from a more mechanical basis doesn't make the conclusions anymore or less when based on subjective axioms.
Edit : In short the argument , a soul, is unproveable from any angle, its just a concept.
Edit2 : so your definition of the soul is ??
|