"Any rudeness on my part is due to frustration at apparent lack of comprehension."
OK, fair enough. So (assuming you know how to use a simple forum like this) we can all seee with ease how my title post did raise your ire to such a level that you considered me (pre-emptively) a 'zealot' and responded (by your own admission above) rudely.
For the record, I never mind being proved wrong and will gladly apologise if so proved. I will also gladly be shown where I was zealous aforethought.
SO in the spirit of honest enquiry, we shall look at my title post:
and compare it with your direct response (listed in the flat view under 'replies').
Now it should be a SIMPLE task, as my actual comments where not so long (the majority of my post was devoted to an actual Pell quote), to point out where I was displaying the 'lack of comprehension' to be afforded your rudeness.
Lastly, Dark Magus decides to call me a fool. Because I defended myself? Or because the title post of this thread is the work of a fool , er, me?
So, you decree that one of is a fool. It shouldn't be so for you hard to pick any-sized quote of mine to prove that I am:
1. A Zealot.
2. A fool.
3. Lacking comprehension
Otherwise it would appear that you are nothing but the cock crowing on it's own dung-heap. Surely it's fair to ask for evidence before I roll aver and wear those four labels.