Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Trethevy Quoit »
Trevethy Quoit
Log In to post a reply

107 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
tiompan
tiompan
5758 posts

Re: Trevethy Quoit
Apr 19, 2011, 11:14
Horsedrawn wrote:
I have learnt to listen to all points of view and anyway arguing or simple gainsaying gets us nowhere. It is only now, as the evidence piles up, that I have had the courage to 'go public' with this. Over the years it has been the policy to stick to science but I become more and more interested in the 'fringe'; earth energies, ley lines etc. and keeping an open mind is greatly assisted by just listening and not being automatically dismissive. I would dearly love to see Trethevy Quoit assume its proper place in the history of science and in the art of building; that is, as architecture. To arrange stones together is one thing, but if they are worked it is another. These stones have been worked, and apart from the fallen Stone 7, remain in their original position. I state these things with a great deal of confidence, but always the words of Cryrus Redding stay with me:- "we become more anxious to acquire the knowledge respecting it which we are at the same time conscious we can never attain."

David Kane


Can I suggest doing similar tests on another quoit and also use lanyon Quoit as a control. As it was re-erected the findings would have no relation to the intention of the builders
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index