"Today, EH said that's not what they meant "in their wildest dreams" and they were aiming to go in on the basis of zero damage or a minimum amount. We look forward to seeing that in print and for the Risk Assessment to be amended to say that there will be no tunnel enlargement by 0.2m and no consequent loss of 166m3. Indeed, if they can do it we'll be the first to hail the miracle."
The Risk Assesment is there to provide a 'worse case' scenario - thats what its done for, it doesn't mean it will happen, but is the WORST that might happen.
"So, we were guilty of believing EH's Risk Assessment. "
No you were guilty of misunderstanding the nature of a Risk Assessment.
|