Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Silbury Hill »
Silbury Round One
This topic is locked

115 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Ishmael
683 posts

Silbury Round One
Nov 26, 2005, 15:53
Ding ding,
Mike Pitts referee.
Various EH bods gave a lengthy presentation on the state of the hill so far and what has been done over the last 5 years. Nothing new was announced.
Round Two.
The floor was open for questions and Nigel Swift immediatly leapt up and went up to the podium and launched into a lengthy rant asking why grouting had been thrown out as an option and various other questions based on speculative figures about damage and the time it would take for natural damage to equal excavation damage if the hill was left alone for a long period of time.
EH Prof countered with an arguement that Grouting would introduce water into the hill which could do more damage and moaned that HA had twisted his arm to make him speculate on the damage figures.
Mike Pitts intervened asking why HA's website makes comments about archoaelogists wanting to further their careers and said EH might archaeologists might comment on this further.
Round Three.
Another member of the audience actualy got a chance to ask a question and asked if EH had considered other types of grouting using a dry material.
EH replied that the hill Has to be infilled with chalk.
An audience member at the back stood up and announced he was the Director of the BBC film during Atkinsons dig in the 1960 and gave an interesting speech about his perspective and asked why the hill wasn't properly backfilled by an emminent archaeologist who was respected in his field at that time.
EH replied Atkinson threw a fit when he wasn't allowed to leave the tunnels open and only backfilled 4M from the entrance.
EH also said the a Bristol man had been in touch who was part of the backfilling team and he would be contacted again.
At this point King Arthur left (well the pubs are open and there is longer drinking hours these days)
More questions from HA which actualy got a "No" answer. The first admission that they didn't really know what they are doing.
Mike suggested that Nigel communicate privately with EH rather than dominate the questions,
EH said the website has now got lots more info for people to download.
Someone asked if there could be a better, higher fence put up and EH said No as people will always climb over or cut through. One person recently cut themselves on barbed wire and are now suing EH.
The barbwire is currently being removed. EH said people keep removing the signs they put up.

Finaly I managed to get a question in (remind me not to sit behind Nigel again)
and I asked "When are you going to start digging?" which got a grin from the panel.
Through the fluff it seems that the tender has been put out and that Skanska will probably get the contract to empty the tunnel and take out as little original material as possible. Preferably none.
Nothing will be done before summer 2006.

Mike Pitts blew the whistle and EH announced that if anyone is interested there is a one day course on Silbury at Oxford University on 25th Feb 2006.
Tickets are only £47

After the talk I managed to collar the BBC man and asked where all the spoil was put when Atkinson went in with his bulldozers.
He told me it was put into a huge pile in the meadow but he wasn't there during the backfilling.
Neil Mortimor and I had a chin wag and wondered if the many tons of missing spoil had been flytipped up the road creating Silbaby? If this is so then a dig into Silbaby may be able to rescue the missing primary mound material with the organic matter than EH are so anxious to get their hands on.
Look out for Forteans Times Christmas issue.
I'm sure others who were at the meeting will have plenty to add...
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index