U-Know! Forum » Extinction Rebellion |
Log In to post a reply
|
|
|
Topic View: Flat | Threaded |
Amil04 447 posts |
Apr 29, 2019, 17:03
|
||
: )) Who’s gonna write the algorithms for those tests!?
|
|||
Amil04 447 posts |
Edited Apr 29, 2019, 17:16
Apr 29, 2019, 17:12
|
||
Ps. Ok, you win. I’ll be glueing my arse to something presently.. : ))
|
|||
Amil04 447 posts |
Edited Jun 12, 2019, 21:25
Jun 11, 2019, 15:36
|
||
Interview with Roger Hallam. https://youtu.be/Ozw8kF3EBWQ Danny Shine “calls himself out”..I think is the phrase, as a stooge? How did he get this interview? Many an independent researcher would’ve taken on the carbon debt of small country for the ‘privilege’. Joking aside.. The guy behind the camera asks the best questions..which go largely unanswered. Didn’t do much for me. Agents of the State! The lot of them! Update. Maybe I’m being a bit harsh towards Danny. Roger rambles like a mad man. Notice how in your mind the background starts to look like a hospital ward. His body language speaks volumes.
|
|||
Amil04 447 posts |
Edited Jun 14, 2019, 19:16
Jun 12, 2019, 14:48
|
||
Clare Parker writes..“As most of the CO2 is in the ocean, are the (relatively small) amounts released by burning fossil fuels not irrelevant? PROFESSOR JOHN SHEPHERD FRS, TYNDALL CENTRE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, NATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHY CENTRE, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON, writes: The oceans contain indeed about 95% of the natural CO2 in the ocean/ atmosphere/ biosphere system, and about 90% of the man-made CO2 will also end up in the oceans eventually (i.e. in about 1,000 years’ time). The atmosphere normally contains only about 2% of the total CO2 (the rest is in the terrestrial vegetation and soils). However, the amount released by burning fossil fuels has been sufficient to increase atmospheric concentrations by about 35%, even though about half of it has actually already been absorbed by the oceans and the terrestrial biosphere. It is CO2 left in the atmosphere that really matters, because that is where it causes the greenhouse effect, and whether or not there is also a large amount in the ocean is irrelevant.” Does this make sense to you? Because it doesn’t to me. “and about 90% of the man made CO2 will also end up in the oceans eventually (ie in about a thousand years)” “However the amount released by burning fossil fuels has been sufficient to increase atmospheric concentration by about 35%, even though about half of it has actually already been absorbed by the oceans and terrestrial biosphere.” Contradictory? Or am I being thick? Thought it took a thousand years to be taken up by the oceans? 35%..really? Source : HH. https://www.headheritage.co.uk/uknow/features/?id=82 If you’d never heard about CO2, global warming, climate change, climate emergency/catastrophe etc. would you personally say that the weather has changed in your lifetime? Not here it hasn’t. It used to rain more in September, now it rains more in June..that’s about it.
|
|||
Amil04 447 posts |
Edited Jun 12, 2019, 21:25
Jun 12, 2019, 15:14
|
||
..and just what happened to tjj’s original topic about Extinction Rebellion? Is there a moderator around to help with this issue please?....tjj deleted it?..a moderator did or it just fucked off on its own? Any guesses folks, has this happened before?
|
Pages: 6 – [ Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 ] | Add a reply to this topic |
|
|
U-Know! Forum Index |