jonmor wrote: nigelswift wrote:
Good luck with producing a common unit of comparison out of that lot!
You may be right: It may not be worth the effort of putting in a holding set of arguments in the current consultation. I'll take a look at it next week.
I AM right!
I spent 27 years producing a house valuation system which applied an adjusted common unit of comparison. But houses, unlike heritage, are very clearly financial assets so the unit was pounds per adjusted unit obviously. To have tried to do that to a heritage asset using an "intellectual appreciation" unit of comparison would be just silly.
|