FourWinds
|
Erm ...
Sep 05, 2003, 12:11
|
|
... maybe I shouldn't :-)
|
treaclechops
|
Re: Erm ...
Sep 05, 2003, 12:13
|
It was using a digital camera, therefore not 'arty'. :o)
treaclechops xx
|
Wotan
|
Re: neolithic community
Sep 05, 2003, 12:23
|
absolutely about people - look at "runover Gibbon" for example - hope RG's little un isnt put off trekking!
I'll have to put my money where my profile is and get my own mugshot up - now that is scary!
|
Wotan
|
Re: Lion Down
Sep 05, 2003, 12:24
|
|
how old is that logo? Mine'd have to be a jar of Marmite!
|
FourWinds
|
|
What? No porn? erm ... sorry ... I mean 'Art'?
Disappointed of Dublin :-(
|
FourWinds
|
And anyway ...
Sep 05, 2003, 12:30
|
... does using a digital camera mean you can't be 'arty'?
That's a very elitist statement I reckon. I want a EOS D1 ....
|
morfe lux
|
Re: And anyway ...
Sep 05, 2003, 16:09
|
I'm watching this discussion with great interest ;-)
Yours,
Digital SLR user.
(artistically challenged on account of having a CMOS sensor as opposed to bits of dead animal behind the shutter)
|
FourWinds
|
Ooh! Ooh!
Sep 05, 2003, 16:24
|
|
Which one you got then, you lucky thing?
|
Moth
|
Re: And anyway ...
Sep 05, 2003, 16:25
|
Bloody flash yanks. (Snigger)
love
Moth
|
Hob
|
Re: probability of art
Sep 05, 2003, 16:33
|
I thought it would be easier to be arty with a digital camera.
If you got desperate, you can always use film to photograph the monitor.
|
