handofdave wrote: Well, he's used atheism as a way to become a celebrity and cash in on it. Which makes him little better than the holy rollers who exploit faith for a quick buck.
Are you really saying that the only reason he's done his work is to be famous and make money? That he doesn't believe any of what he says, he just saw a gap in the marketplace and moved in?
The only more charitable reading I can take from your comment is that anyone who makes a living from what they do is a whore like phoney evangelists. Would you level the same criticism at, say, Bill Hicks, Kurt Vonnegut, Nelson Mandela?
|