|
GLADMAN wrote: Howburn Digger wrote: GLADMAN wrote: Iraq was already in the Stoneage. How could it be otherwise, when 'knowledge' begins and ends with the Qu'ran?
Iraq was a fairly secular state and Saddam fought against Khomeini's Islamic Revolution. Get your history right even if your view of the Qu'ran and "knowledge" is as twisted as an Ulster Orangeman's view of "christianity" and the role of women.
Iraq was a well integrated multi-religion state which had suffered very little religious violence between the communities - except when Zionists bombed synagogues in 1951 in order to frighten Jews and stir up fear, reprisals and unrest.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/16/sectarian-myth-of-iraq
Twisted? I find that utterly beyond belief and beneath contempt.
To say that Iraq was a peaceful little hallow before 1951 is such rubbish historically the region has been at war since biblical times. It seems no matter how outrageous and how brutal and murderous a insane group of thugs are there will always be some P.C. chickenshit willing to support them in fear perhaps of sounding as aggressive or bloodthirsty as the group they are defending. this is 2015 not 915B.C. Society as evolved beyond beheading sale and rape of women,Acid attacks on those who do not wear the proper religious garb Holy wars etc... Those who do not wish to abide by the rules of the greater good are not looking to coexist or just do their own thing and get a long They are not looking for a group hug or a fucking love in NO...they are hell bent to destroy History as well as the future for all those who do not see things the same way.
|
