Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
County Dublin »
Monu-Mental About Prehistoric Dublin
Log In to post a reply

Pages: 12 – [ Previous | 13 4 5 6 7 8 | Next ]
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
rocknicker
rocknicker
908 posts

Re: Monu-Mental About Prehistoric Dublin
Nov 03, 2006, 15:12
Congrats! If we ever get to Ireland...
postman
848 posts

Re: Monu-Mental About Prehistoric Dublin
Nov 03, 2006, 18:58
Vybik Jon wrote:
Midlanders are really thick, you know.

Fantastic stuff.

Chuffed for you. Indeed - bostin'!

x


You calling me thick?
Vybik Jon
Vybik Jon
7720 posts

Re: Monu-Mental About Prehistoric Dublin
Nov 03, 2006, 19:07
Absolutely not!

Us Midlanders have got to stick together against the prejudices of those on the margins.
postman
848 posts

Re: Monu-Mental About Prehistoric Dublin
Nov 03, 2006, 19:17
Vybik Jon wrote:
Absolutely not!

Us Midlanders have got to stick together against the prejudices of those on the margins.



Okely dokely,sorry the simpsons are on,
Hob
Hob
4033 posts

Re: Monu-Mental About Prehistoric Dublin
Nov 03, 2006, 23:26
Gerrinthere Mr FourWinds, that sounds like a very nice buzz.

nigelswift wrote:
British Bullauns next please.

Mmm. Yeh.

Listen to the man FW, for he is as wise as you are chuffed :)
Pete G
Pete G
3506 posts

Re: Monu-Mental About Prehistoric Dublin
Nov 03, 2006, 23:41
How much more for an inscription?

"Thanks for a glorious night of passion on the beach under the stars"

sort of thing :)
PeteG
FourWinds
FourWinds
10943 posts

Re: Monu-Mental About Prehistoric Dublin
Nov 04, 2006, 07:56
Pete G wrote:
How much more for an inscription?

"Thanks for a glorious night of passion on the beach under the stars"

sort of thing :)
PeteG


You couldn't afford it. Not even the inscription :-)
FourWinds
FourWinds
10943 posts

Re: bit of controversy
Nov 04, 2006, 10:36
fitzcoraldo wrote:
I hope I'm mistaken, I'm sure the MP ed wouldn't be that petty.


Apparently, it was removed because of some fecking spelling mistakes and because Andy B considers fecking to be a genuine swear word, which is the only controversy here.

That's fair enough by me. I'd rather any announcements about my book didn't have spelling mistakes. Still, it was nice of Kevin to mention it.
postman
848 posts

Re: bit of controversy
Nov 04, 2006, 11:55
FourWinds wrote:
fitzcoraldo wrote:
I hope I'm mistaken, I'm sure the MP ed wouldn't be that petty.


Apparently, it was removed because of some fecking spelling mistakes and because Andy B considers fecking to be a genuine swear word, which is the only controversy here.

That's fair enough by me. I'd rather any announcements about my book didn't have spelling mistakes. Still, it was nice of Kevin to mention it.


I thought feck was a swearword too (but then I once thought a Punt was a pound with an Irish Accent) so what does it mean if not what it looks like .P.S like the new picture
FourWinds
FourWinds
10943 posts

Re: bit of controversy
Nov 04, 2006, 12:17
postman wrote:
[quote="FourWinds"]I thought feck was a swearword too (but then I once thought a Punt was a pound with an Irish Accent) so what does it mean if not what it looks like .P.S like the new picture


No. It has the same roots as 'feckless' meaning weak. Feck means strong or firm. It's just handily interchangable with fuck and Father Ted made it popular. It was originally just a way of not saying fuck in a Catholic country. It's as inoffensive as flipping or flamin' really. The offense is all in the ear of the hearer. It's a bit like smeg in Red Dwarf, although that does have rather unpleasant roots.

There's a place just north of Dublin called Termonfeckin, which makes me giggle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feck
Pages: 12 – [ Previous | 13 4 5 6 7 8 | Next ] Add a reply to this topic

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index