nigelswift
|
Re: Living Heritage
Nov 06, 2003, 15:36
|
Protecting the Past in the Present
(dinky summation of conservation issues)
|
Kammer
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 06, 2003, 15:37
|
Would anyone object to starting a new thread on this? It's getting tricky reading all this, and we really do need to distil our thoughts a bit.
I was thinking along the lines of "Getting Serious about Conservation 2".
K x
|
Moth
|
Re: Living Heritage
Nov 06, 2003, 15:39
|
See what everyone else thinks N. I find alliteration in the strapline a bit, 'clunky' or summat, but I think it's just me.
love
Moth
|
BrigantesNation
|
Re: Heritage Action
Nov 06, 2003, 15:49
|
Heritage Action
That's my favourite so far.
Leave out the work though!
|
nigelswift
|
Re: Living Heritage
Nov 06, 2003, 15:50
|
|
Yes it's just you. You're obviously fixated on seeing clunky. It's very hurtful for a sincere person to be told they're clunky. Especially in view of my wooden leg you swine.
|
Moth
|
Bleeding Heritage
Nov 06, 2003, 15:52
|
I've said it before, and I'll say it again nigel:
Twat.
love
Moth
|
Moth
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 06, 2003, 15:56
|
With you on that K. Though Heritage Action seems to be emerging as a clear fave, think the strapline's gonna take a while given some of the 'CLUNKERS' tha Swifty likes....
love
Moth
|
nigelswift
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 06, 2003, 16:00
|
|
Supplementy threads have to start with some relevant poetry. It's a rule. I'd do it myself but I've just burned all mine.
|
Steve Gray
|
Re: Dual identity?
Nov 06, 2003, 16:06
|
|
Would "We don't intentionally break the law" cover it?
|
Earthstepper
|
Re: Heritage Action Group
Nov 06, 2003, 16:12
|
|
I agree on both counts
|
