You've made no attempt to engage with what GruftyJim so carefully explained. But why not?
What he's explained looks like a variety of incontrovertible arguments for a total ban, if elephant protection is the desired outcome. If you read what he's written the information might make you wonder why your beloved Tory overlords don't want such a ban. Hmm. Why could that be? Why would they change their minds? (can you feel the cogs whirring?)
Did you read it? Did you wonder why the tories' line differs from all these agencies and scientists?
|