The Sea Cat wrote: Why do you need to reply to my post twice ? My viewpoint is clear enough.
I'm not being horrible, I'm just pointing out that your view is at odds with both the skeptic and warmist view, so you are in a very strange place indeed, neither one side or the other. So, I suggested you have a look at the evidence yourself. Something the IPCC obviously, from the e-mails, don't do either.
None so blind and all of that... At least I read both sides, a luxury that skeptics actually have.
If you make a point or strong view known online then expect varying views.
|