landells wrote: So...
an organisation that has been peddling crap has now said something you agree with and therefore it is correct
Ha, nice take, but no.
Both sides are coming into line and if that continues perhaps we'll get some real, non-broken-peer-reviewed, common sense, real climate model, consensus going.
That's all the sceptics want, is to be included in the process aas a balance to the zealots and delusional nut-cases.
The e-mails have helped, there's at least one internal e-mail describing some foundation data for global temp series as, quote: 'crap'.
Crap.
|