Moon Cat
|
Edited Oct 25, 2009, 16:19
Re: opinions on last night's question time
Oct 25, 2009, 16:18
|
|
Aye. Thing is though, I have had the misfortune to engage with people in these troubled times with people - not friends or relatives I must add - that have wavered if not shown actual support for the BNP and their ilk. Random pub chats that kinda thing. For the most part they, when asked what are the BNP's policies on 'the other stuff' they seem to be as clueless as me and unaware of such things. It seems that the BNP aren't that hot at selling 'the other stuff' just yet, although it could be I've just met people that don't care.
|
Lord Lucan
|
Re: opinions on last night's question time
Oct 25, 2009, 17:20
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_EpcW6ucbo
|
dave clarkson
|
Re: opinions on last night's question time
Oct 25, 2009, 17:25
|
ha! excellent.
8)
|
Popel Vooje
|
Re: opinions on last night's question time
Oct 25, 2009, 17:36
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QAvkFS_cgk
|
handofdave
|
Re: opinions on last night's question time
Oct 25, 2009, 17:40
|
Ratcni01 said, "If a rise in attacks can be correlated with their appearance then this justifies them not being invited on again indeed invited to get any air time at all."
I'm sorry to be playing 'devils advocate'... it's not that I have any love for fascists (just the opposite) but I like to try to stop and think about it like a lawyer might... as the BNP has just as much access to the courts as their opposition, it behooves the opposition to strategize in every regard so that there's more than just a public revulsion to their creed- there's got to be well thought out legal tools in place that help stem the BNP's ability to operate without the chance that it could backfire and hurt those that are fighting them.
Of course, England could just do as Germany did after WW2 and make the propagation of fascism a prosecutable crime.
|
