Head To Head
Log In
Register
U-Know! Forum »
Rubbish & chips
Log In to post a reply

Pages: 5 – [ Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next ]
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
pooley
pooley
501 posts

Re: Rubbish & chips
Aug 30, 2006, 14:32
How does a number on a bin stop anyone putting anything in?
FourWinds
FourWinds
10943 posts

Re: Rubbish & chips
Aug 30, 2006, 14:34
pooley wrote:
How does a number on a bin stop anyone putting anything in?


I never said it did (although I didn't say that it did very clearly :-). It just meant that you know that you have your bin - i.e. it's not in your neighbours garden being filled up by them.

Obviously, they could sneak into your garden and dump a load of stuff in there.

Question: How do you feel about businesses having to pay proportionally for the waste they produce?
grufty jim
grufty jim
1978 posts

Edited Aug 30, 2006, 14:51
Re: Rubbish & chips
Aug 30, 2006, 14:51
pooley wrote:
How does a number on a bin stop anyone putting anything in?


As Fourwinds has already pointed out, pooley, the bins have gravity locks on them (leastways around here they do). This means they can't be opened without the household key or unless they are turned upside-down (as when they are tipped into the back of the garbage truck).

It's really very simple and works well.

I'm still mystified as to why you think there'll be "literal warfare on the streets" in the UK despite the fact that nothing of the sort occurred in the US or in Ireland when schemes like this were introduced.

I'm genuinely interested in why you think the UK will be so different in this regard.
grufty jim
grufty jim
1978 posts

Re: Rubbish & chips
Aug 30, 2006, 15:13
pooley wrote:
Ok, I know i've been a bit flip about all this. But I have said that I agree that we all have to manage our waste properly. I just don't think this is the way. From the very start it's been underhand and secretive and, as you have quite rightly said, could have been handled better.

Indeed. But the fact that the council have handled the PR badly doesn't really have much bearing on the merits of the scheme. I honestly don't believe (sadly) that people are responsible enough to minimise the waste they produce without some form of incentive (or disincentive). And charging a fee based upon the quantity of waste you produce seems the obvious and fairest way of doing that.

Do you have another suggestion that would induce people to minimise the waste they produce? I'm not saying you must have a better idea in order to disagree with the one being proposed; I disagree with plenty of policies without having a better idea (knowing something won't work isn't necessarily the same as knowing what will). But I'd be interested in hearing if you do.

As I say; this is a system that is working well in some countries, so there's at least some evidence that it might work in the UK. Why not try it then? If it doesn't work, then scrap it and try something else. But people need to stop generating waste in the quantities they're currently doing.

pooley wrote:
Sorry that I didn't say when I agreed with you. Like you I think that something needs to be done, like you I think we all have to claim personal responsibility for our waste. Like you (i'm assuming) I recycle, and do all I can to manage my waste.

Seriously man, I wasn't suggesting you should say "I agree" to things I say, merely that it's frustrating to provide a considered response and get zero feedback on it. Whether you agree, disagree, or think what I'm saying is complete toss isn't the issue... I'm just looking for an indication that I'm not talking to myself.

pooley wrote:
Unlike you, I think this system isn't the way forward. My comment about warfare on the streets was meant to be taken literally. What I meant is, and has been said before on this thread, it will lead to people putting heavier objects in other peoples bins. And disposing of rubbish in less than ethical ways.

Fair enough. If you don't think it's the way forward, do you have any ideas as to what is? (as mentioned elsewhere, I'm not suggesting you do / should / must have a better idea; just interested in what it might be if you do).

And do please answer my other question (posed several times - sorry for repeating myself): why will it result in warfare in the UK, when it didn't in Ireland and the USA? (two nations which - culturally speaking - have more of a history of noncompliance with authority than the UK).

pooley wrote:
Sorry if you thought my objections were only thought up to justify my viewpoint. That isn't the case. The one time when something just popped into my head, I admitted it at the start of the post. Maybe that's where you got the idea. Maybe I'm not very good at expressing myself.

Apologies for the accusation. The reason I like this forum (the reason it's the only one I bother posting to these days) is that most regulars are here to openly discuss ideas and are just as interested in discovering mistakes in their own reasoning as they are in pointing out the same in others. We all have views and ideas that, under scrutiny, simply turn out to be unconscious assumption or sheer prejudice. Me as much as anyone. And there's no greater service you can do me than to show me why an opinion of mine is wrong. I may suffer a mildly bruised ego for 10 minutes, but I've gained some valuable information forever. A trade-off I'm more than willing to make.

(Note: none of this is meant to apply specifically to this discussion - honestly - I'm generalising here, not surreptitiously claiming "I'm right and you're wrong on the rubbish thing.")

And you're as good as anyone at expressing themself pooley. The fact that you get misinterpreted from time to time is a function of online forums, not your writing style. Let me know when I misinterpet you and I'll do the same when you do it to me. I'd put money on the frequency being roughly equal.
grufty jim
grufty jim
1978 posts

Re: Rubbish & chips
Aug 30, 2006, 15:22
Rhiannon, I certainly believe what you say has a lot to do with why the Daily Mail has such a problem with this scheme. I hesitate to think that the objections on this forum are coming from a similar place though. Leastways I hope to god they aren't.
pooley
pooley
501 posts

Edited Aug 30, 2006, 16:29
Re: Rubbish & chips
Aug 30, 2006, 16:26
grufty jim wrote:
pooley wrote:
Ok, I know i've been a bit flip about all this. But I have said that I agree that we all have to manage our waste properly. I just don't think this is the way. From the very start it's been underhand and secretive and, as you have quite rightly said, could have been handled better.

Indeed. But the fact that the council have handled the PR badly doesn't really have much bearing on the merits of the scheme. I honestly don't believe (sadly) that people are responsible enough to minimise the waste they produce without some form of incentive (or disincentive). And charging a fee based upon the quantity of waste you produce seems the obvious and fairest way of doing that.

Do you have another suggestion that would induce people to minimise the waste they produce? I'm not saying you must have a better idea in order to disagree with the one being proposed; I disagree with plenty of policies without having a better idea (knowing something won't work isn't necessarily the same as knowing what will). But I'd be interested in hearing if you do.






I'm afraid, other than education, there is no system that'll work (that I know of) in UK. In a culture when 'being a bit of a greenie' is considered an insult to the daily mail crowd, most trials are doomed to failure. As you say though, that is no reason not to try them.

As I say; this is a system that is working well in some countries, so there's at least some evidence that it might work in the UK. Why not try it then? If it doesn't work, then scrap it and try something else. But people need to stop generating waste in the quantities they're currently doing.

Agreed, but when it is handed to us by stealth, it straight away makes people suspicious. Open and honest is the only way. but, as you say the way it was introduced is not a reason for not trying to combat waste.








pooley wrote:
Sorry that I didn't say when I agreed with you. Like you I think that something needs to be done, like you I think we all have to claim personal responsibility for our waste. Like you (i'm assuming) I recycle, and do all I can to manage my waste.

Seriously man, I wasn't suggesting you should say "I agree" to things I say, merely that it's frustrating to provide a considered response and get zero feedback on it. Whether you agree, disagree, or think what I'm saying is complete toss isn't the issue... I'm just looking for an indication that I'm not talking to myself.





point taken!!


I hope :)






pooley wrote:
Unlike you, I think this system isn't the way forward. My comment about warfare on the streets was meant to be taken literally. What I meant is, and has been said before on this thread, it will lead to people putting heavier objects in other peoples bins. And disposing of rubbish in less than ethical ways.

Fair enough. If you don't think it's the way forward, do you have any ideas as to what is? (as mentioned elsewhere, I'm not suggesting you do / should / must have a better idea; just interested in what it might be if you do).

And do please answer my other question (posed several times - sorry for repeating myself): why will it result in warfare in the UK, when it didn't in Ireland and the USA? (two nations which - culturally speaking - have more of a history of noncompliance with authority than the UK).









My comment about it resulting in warfare was meant to be light hearted. What I meant, and have said before, is that it'll result in sneaky little herberts dispossing of their waste in ways that we don't want them to. Putting rubbish in other peoples bins (however much people secure them, someone will find a way round it) dumping difficult stuff in fields, on the street etc.

What I meant by warfare was that it'll only take a few people catching someone using their bin for BIN RAGE to become an epidemic. Or at least in the eyes of the general population.








pooley wrote:
Sorry if you thought my objections were only thought up to justify my viewpoint. That isn't the case. The one time when something just popped into my head, I admitted it at the start of the post. Maybe that's where you got the idea. Maybe I'm not very good at expressing myself.

Apologies for the accusation. The reason I like this forum (the reason it's the only one I bother posting to these days) is that most regulars are here to openly discuss ideas and are just as interested in discovering mistakes in their own reasoning as they are in pointing out the same in others. We all have views and ideas that, under scrutiny, simply turn out to be unconscious assumption or sheer prejudice. Me as much as anyone. And there's no greater service you can do me than to show me why an opinion of mine is wrong. I may suffer a mildly bruised ego for 10 minutes, but I've gained some valuable information forever. A trade-off I'm more than willing to make.






:)








(Note: none of this is meant to apply specifically to this discussion - honestly - I'm generalising here, not surreptitiously claiming "I'm right and you're wrong on the rubbish thing.")

And you're as good as anyone at expressing themself pooley. The fact that you get misinterpreted from time to time is a function of online forums, not your writing style. Let me know when I misinterpet you and I'll do the same when you do it to me. I'd put money on the frequency being roughly equal.










Thanks jim. I'm fairly new here, and didn't expect to get so deep into something quite so quickly, but (sorry) i'm enjoying disagreeing with you. Thanks for making it fun, and informative, rather than just a row.

I've just noticed how much of a mess this post is, what with all the quoting an requoting, so I've tried to put a bit of space betwen our comments,.
FourWinds
FourWinds
10943 posts

Re: Rubbish & chips
Aug 30, 2006, 16:37
grufty jim wrote:
... the bins have gravity locks on them (leastways around here they do).


Cor! Someone lives in the posh area! Optional extras around our way :-)
grufty jim
grufty jim
1978 posts

Re: Rubbish & chips
Aug 30, 2006, 17:34
FourWinds wrote:
grufty jim wrote:
... the bins have gravity locks on them (leastways around here they do).


Cor! Someone lives in the posh area! Optional extras around our way :-)

I'm in a new development in Rathcoole. It's certainly a little posher than the places I lived in London, but not off-the-scale posh. I think it was just one of those things that they decided to make standard in the estate... and given the size of the annual maintenance fee we pay, it's the least they could do! I've noticed that once you step outside the estate, the locks aren't fit as standard... though I've not heard of any local problems with people stealing bin space.
grufty jim
grufty jim
1978 posts

Re: Rubbish & chips
Aug 30, 2006, 17:50
pooley wrote:
Thanks jim. I'm fairly new here, and didn't expect to get so deep into something quite so quickly, but (sorry) i'm enjoying disagreeing with you. Thanks for making it fun, and informative, rather than just a row.

Well, this place has certainly seen plenty of rows. I even stormed out in a huff about a year ago when the trolls had become a tad too frequent for my liking. But just when I thought I was out... they pulled me back in!* There's just too many groovy folks hereabouts.

I think on this issue we're basically down to the "I just don't think it would work" / "Well, I think it would work" stage of the debate. We both - I believe - agree that the basic principle of people paying for waste disposal in proportion to the amount of waste they generate is A Good Thing. The only question is whether or not it would work in practice.

Having lived for a long time in the UK, and now living in Ireland (plus having experienced the pay-per-bag scheme in Illinois) I have to say that I'm impressed with how well the schemes do work. In Illinois, for instance, they have a different scheme... you buy special tags that you stick onto your bags (in practice they can't be removed as the adhesive bonds with the plastic of the bag) and the bin-men only collect bags that are tagged.

I think the Irish system of paying by weight is probably better, but both encourage people to minimise the amount they throw away. In conjunction with very heavy penalties for fly-tipping they have reduced the amount of waste generated significantly (I recall reading the figures and being impressed, but can't be arsed to track them down right now).

I honestly don't see why such schemes wouldn't work in the UK. Yes there will be the occasional nutter who refuses to comply, and some nasty neighbours who steal bin space. But the vast majority of households will make an effort to reduce waste, more than compensating for the few who object.

----------------------------------------------------
* To be said in an Al Pacino voice.
nigelswift
8112 posts

Re: Rubbish & chips
Aug 30, 2006, 19:23
My ONLY problem with this is if it was done without people having been told. That seems bonkers, but apart from that it makes perfect sense and needs extending to all sorts of areas in a world of scarce resources and global warming. Polluter and consumers should all pay according to what they do or use. What could be fairer? Nowt.

Then along comes Jeremy Clarkson and moans about big cars being taxed and speed limits being reduced. Grrrrrrrrrr.
Pages: 5 – [ Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next ] Add a reply to this topic

U-Know! Forum Index