Head To Head
Log In
Register
U-Know! Forum »
Waterloo Cup Moved To Avooid Ban
Log In to post a reply

Topic View: Flat | Threaded
anthonyqkiernan
anthonyqkiernan
7087 posts

Waterloo Cup Moved To Avooid Ban
Feb 14, 2005, 13:28
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/4262065.stm

"The rules of coursing are designed specifically to assist the hare to escape. In an average season, seven out of eight hares coursed escape," said the club's website.

That's alright, then.

Bloke on the news there just answered (when asked if he would continue coursing after the ban) "well, I occaisionally speed when I'm late for the races - this is pretty much the same thing".

Bet he complains about speed cameras. just being there to make his life a misery.
Nat
Nat
1905 posts

Re: Waterloo Cup Moved To Avooid Ban
Feb 16, 2005, 10:56
http://www.nwlacs.co.uk/archive/waterloo_cup_2005.htm

Report on yesterdays Waterloo Cup... From the League Against Cruel Sports, I really don't want to go onto the Countryside Alliance's Website to find the counter arguement!!! If anyone does, then that's fine by me!!

ONLY 4 hares killed yesterday, so that's ok then.... wankers... :o(
anthonyqkiernan
anthonyqkiernan
7087 posts

Hunt Ban Upheld
Feb 16, 2005, 18:45
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4269449.stm

Anyone know just what the constitutional rammifications are if they do take this to the Lords? Surely if they decide that hte Parliamen tary Act doesn't stand, they are fundamentally challenging the make up of HM Govt?
Nat
Nat
1905 posts

Re: Hunt Ban Upheld
Feb 17, 2005, 09:01
http://www.league.uk.com/huntingbill/index.htm

Possibly not what you are asking, but kinda of!! ;o)
Nat
Nat
1905 posts

Also....
Feb 17, 2005, 09:03
http://www.league.uk.com/news/latest_news/latest_news.htm

Just incase anyone fancies it!!

http://www.huntcrimewatch.com/
anthonyqkiernan
anthonyqkiernan
7087 posts

Re: Also....
Feb 17, 2005, 10:22
All that porn you link to gets blocked my my work ;-)

I don't think there's a hope in hell of the Lords finding in favour (and certainly not hte Human Rights court). Was just interested in what it could mean theoretically. If they decided that the parliamentary act (which can be invoked to bypass them) doesn't stand are they effectively setting up a challenge to the supremacy of HM Gov and the democaratic rights of the land.
Nat
Nat
1905 posts

Re: Also....
Feb 17, 2005, 11:02
"are they effectively setting up a challenge to the supremacy of HM Gov and the democaratic rights of the land."

Yep, basically!!! :o) There is a really good BBC link.. hang on and I'll bung it up in a mo....

T'weren't porn!! Was just the answer to your questions!! Maybe your work place is in favour of Hunting and blocks any Sabbing or Anti-Hunt sites!!! ;o)
anthonyqkiernan
anthonyqkiernan
7087 posts

Re: Also....
Feb 17, 2005, 11:36
Probably. Amont of bloody foxes round here's bound to be an issue. Probably chew through the adsl cabling or something.
U-Know! Forum Index