U-Know! Forum » Waterloo Cup Moved To Avooid Ban |
Log In to post a reply
|
|
|
|
Topic View: Flat | Threaded |
anthonyqkiernan 7087 posts |
Feb 14, 2005, 13:28
|
||
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/4262065.stm "The rules of coursing are designed specifically to assist the hare to escape. In an average season, seven out of eight hares coursed escape," said the club's website. That's alright, then. Bloke on the news there just answered (when asked if he would continue coursing after the ban) "well, I occaisionally speed when I'm late for the races - this is pretty much the same thing". Bet he complains about speed cameras. just being there to make his life a misery.
|
|||
Nat 1905 posts |
Feb 16, 2005, 10:56
|
||
http://www.nwlacs.co.uk/archive/waterloo_cup_2005.htm Report on yesterdays Waterloo Cup... From the League Against Cruel Sports, I really don't want to go onto the Countryside Alliance's Website to find the counter arguement!!! If anyone does, then that's fine by me!! ONLY 4 hares killed yesterday, so that's ok then.... wankers... :o(
|
|||
anthonyqkiernan 7087 posts |
Feb 16, 2005, 18:45
|
||
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4269449.stm Anyone know just what the constitutional rammifications are if they do take this to the Lords? Surely if they decide that hte Parliamen tary Act doesn't stand, they are fundamentally challenging the make up of HM Govt?
|
|||
Nat 1905 posts |
Feb 17, 2005, 09:01
|
||
http://www.league.uk.com/huntingbill/index.htm Possibly not what you are asking, but kinda of!! ;o)
|
|||
Nat 1905 posts |
Feb 17, 2005, 09:03
|
||
http://www.league.uk.com/news/latest_news/latest_news.htm Just incase anyone fancies it!! http://www.huntcrimewatch.com/
|
|||
anthonyqkiernan 7087 posts |
Feb 17, 2005, 10:22
|
||
All that porn you link to gets blocked my my work ;-) I don't think there's a hope in hell of the Lords finding in favour (and certainly not hte Human Rights court). Was just interested in what it could mean theoretically. If they decided that the parliamentary act (which can be invoked to bypass them) doesn't stand are they effectively setting up a challenge to the supremacy of HM Gov and the democaratic rights of the land.
|
|||
Nat 1905 posts |
Feb 17, 2005, 11:02
|
||
"are they effectively setting up a challenge to the supremacy of HM Gov and the democaratic rights of the land." Yep, basically!!! :o) There is a really good BBC link.. hang on and I'll bung it up in a mo.... T'weren't porn!! Was just the answer to your questions!! Maybe your work place is in favour of Hunting and blocks any Sabbing or Anti-Hunt sites!!! ;o)
|
|||
anthonyqkiernan 7087 posts |
Feb 17, 2005, 11:36
|
||
Probably. Amont of bloody foxes round here's bound to be an issue. Probably chew through the adsl cabling or something.
|
U-Know! Forum Index |