=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
U-Know! Forum »
Rumsfeld:no link between iraq and al qai
Log In to post a reply
38 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Lugia
970 posts

Re: and now no sign of any "WMD"?
Oct 07, 2004, 17:41
Aha..."Dick" Cheney was just on CNN over here in the States saying that while there were no WMDs, Saddam deserved to be attacked because he was profiteering from the UN Oil for Food program.

So by logical extension, the USA should be attacked because of Halliburton's 'interesting' dealings in Iraq, as well as their dealings with Libya and Iran via foreign subsidiaries and, of course, "Dick" Cheney's profiteering from this!?

Nice job, "Dick"...just go right ahead coming up with these half-baked assertions that can SO easily be used as justification for so much more trouble!!!
In reply to:
Re: and now no sign of any "WMD"? (Rhiannon)		 Replies:
Re: and now no sign of any "WMD"? (ron)
Topic Outline:
U-Know! Forum Index