BrigantesNation
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 05, 2003, 10:22
|
|
What about the Heritage Alliance
|
nigelswift
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 05, 2003, 10:26
|
|
Heritage Alliance, yes that's excellent, except we don't want to be bothered about falling down Norman castles etc so maybe The Ancient Heritage Alliance... AHA!
|
BrigantesNation
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 05, 2003, 10:33
|
|
or Prehistoric Heritage Alliance?
|
FourWinds
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 05, 2003, 10:33
|
|
Defenders of Old Heritage - DOH!
|
BrigantesNation
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 05, 2003, 10:35
|
|
Prehistoric Liberation Front
|
nigelswift
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 05, 2003, 10:39
|
On second thoughts, Heritage Alliance is so peachy, I think that's the one. We can always let others use it for Norman Castles etc and the thing might grow.
OK, I hereby appoint myself a member, MHA, and I'll write to EH this very day. It's quite good, as it also sounds like it's an alliance against English Heritage (which it largely is!)
|
BrigantesNation
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 05, 2003, 10:41
|
|
You need a website then, and a logo.
|
nigelswift
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 05, 2003, 10:46
|
Absolutely.
Steve'll give us a website ;) . I'll pay. Or maybe Holy can set up a corner here ;)
Logo?
Competition?
|
BrigantesNation
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 05, 2003, 10:49
|
|
Shall we work on a mission statement?
|
Kammer
|
Re: Getting Serious about Conservation
Nov 05, 2003, 10:50
|
I'm in!
Make the web site sensible though. And make it accessible. It needs to be taken seriously. If you need an extra set of hands on the Web side, let me know.
K x
|
