|
U-Know! Forum » Sarah Palin For president? |
Log In to post a reply
|
|
|
|
| Topic View: Flat | Threaded | |
|
Lawrence 9547 posts |
Nov 26, 2009, 19:39
|
||
I never called Palin names. Whatever gave you that idea?
|
|||
|
Lawrence 9547 posts |
Edited Nov 26, 2009, 19:45
Nov 26, 2009, 19:45
|
||
Oh, and what about your Tourette's Syndrome as far as 'commies' go? Not a bright way to make your point, is it?
|
|||
|
giantleech 37 posts |
Edited Nov 26, 2009, 20:14
Nov 26, 2009, 20:14
|
||
|
Lawrence wrote: Oh, and what about your Tourette's Syndrome as far as 'commies' go? Not a bright way to make your point, is it? Let's see. I just reread all of your posts in this thread (honest to goodness, the things I put myself through in the name of statistical accuracy.) The amount of times you have used/invoked the word 'commies' or 'commie' in this thread so far?: Six. The amount of times I have done the same?: Zero. Please continue with your 'Tourette's Syndrome' gambit if you think it is somehow helping you win some sort of argument (and if you are immune to irony and self-parody.)
|
|||
|
Lawrence 9547 posts |
Edited Nov 26, 2009, 20:19
Nov 26, 2009, 20:17
|
||
|
Gee, yr right this time. I did a search and discovered that... But I didn't call Palin names. You can't prove that.
|
|||
|
giantleech 37 posts |
Nov 26, 2009, 20:21
|
||
|
Lawrence wrote: Gee, yr right this time. I did a search and discovered that... But I didn't call Palin names. You can't prove that. In your heart you called her names, didn't you? Fess up, Lawrence!
|
|||
|
Lawrence 9547 posts |
Nov 26, 2009, 20:26
|
||
|
That's just projection. How can I have something against someone who isn't even that significant? And even if she did win in 2012, well I'm not gonna sweat it. If most Americans are gonna make a poor choice it's not my fault... I'm not really bothered by Palin, really. I just don't take her seriously. (I admit I kinda had hopes that maybe Arnie would get the nod, but seeing how Cali is lately that's not gonna happen...)
|
|||
|
giantleech 37 posts |
Edited Nov 26, 2009, 20:38
Nov 26, 2009, 20:37
|
||
|
Lawrence wrote: That's just projection. How can I have something against someone who isn't even that significant? And even if she did win in 2012, well I'm not gonna sweat it. If most Americans are gonna make a poor choice it's not my fault... I'm not really bothered by Palin, really. I just don't take her seriously. 52.7% of the American electorate (including dead people conveniently 'registered' to vote by ACORN) already made a 'poor choice' (a 'horrendous choice', to be more precise) by voting for the disastrous Barrack Hussein Obama as the President of the USA. Lawrence wrote: And even if she did win in 2012. Now you are projecting correctly! (you know it's going to happen.)
|
|||
|
Lawrence 9547 posts |
Nov 26, 2009, 20:42
|
||
|
giantleech wrote: 52.7% of the American electorate (including dead people conveniently 'registered' to vote by ACORN) already made a 'poor choice' (a 'horrendous choice', to be more precise) by voting for the disastrous Barrack Hussein Obama as the President of the USA. Maybe. Actually I didn't vote for him, in spite of what you think... But I'm thinking if a Republican is gonna win in '12 it'll have to be someone with brains. And I don't wanna say Palin doesn't have brains, but she just doesn't have enough.
|
|||
|
giantleech 37 posts |
Nov 26, 2009, 21:03
|
||
|
Lawrence wrote: giantleech wrote: 52.7% of the American electorate (including dead people conveniently 'registered' to vote by ACORN) already made a 'poor choice' (a 'horrendous choice', to be more precise) by voting for the disastrous Barrack Hussein Obama as the President of the USA. Maybe. Actually I didn't vote for him, in spite of what you think... But I'm thinking if a Republican is gonna win in '12 it'll have to be someone with brains. And I don't wanna say Palin doesn't have brains, but she just doesn't have enough. If the Republican ticket winds up being Palin/Rubio, expect to see the Republicans win the 2012 election in a landslide. You know Palin 'has brains' but, at this point, you can't yet convince yourself that she has 'enough.' I'm betting your perception on that matter will change (in the positive) in a shorter amount of time than you might think (despite the clearly naked partisanship of the 'mainstream' media and their hysterical and more and more impotent and backfiring 'boy who cried wolf' methods of attempts to smear her.) Coming up as well for the future of the Republican party on the national stage: Mark Rubio (VP for 2012), Bobby Jindal (he's going to be great), and Elizabeth Cheney (superb.) After the wipeout of Democrats in the coming 2010 congressional election and Barry being being unceremoniously thrown out on his big floppy ears in 2012, the future of the Republican party (and more importantly, the nation itself) is looking very good indeed!
|
|||
|
Lawrence 9547 posts |
Nov 26, 2009, 21:04
|
||
Well I'll believe it when that happens...
|
| Pages: 7 – [ Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next ] | Add a reply to this topic |
|
|
|
| U-Know! Forum Index | |
