mercian wrote:
There`s always the appeal. How many drunken developments in your town were chucked out then surface later after "appeal".
Well, when it comes to painting the library walls red, yes, but this is huge - too huge to be dealt with the way in which it was.
Five or so minion like council committe members, not everyone who ought to have been involved was.
I think that might look like the ultimate rouse: this way Salmond & co (I really despise the git, always have) can claim the vote was in essence 'undemocratic' - we've heard it already.
Political doublespeak toss fer sure.
Trump says he'll make the development as 'enviromentally empatheitc' as possible (?), and that he's doing this out of his love for the place and the people (got a Scottish granny or something).
Somehow though, I think there might be something like a shoot to kill policy should one of us lowly proles go anywhere near the place.
Shit - means bastardface Connery might be tempted back too - bah!
x
|