Wiggy
|
Re: hooray
Aug 12, 2005, 14:16
|
Yer not expecting an argument are you?
I thought he had condemned all murder of "civilians" - wasn't aware of his "magnificent 19" comment.
I think there's a bit in the Quran along the lines of .."He who kills one man, kills all mankind" - which is a good one, I think.
Have you seen "The Hamburg Cell"? excellent film about the perpetrators of the "9/11" attacks. I recommend.
|
Lawrence
|
Re: hooray
Aug 12, 2005, 18:01
|
|
I think you are. Just the way you continually insult anyone who does anything positive with your disgusting vile remarks.
|
anthonyqkiernan
|
Re: hooray
Aug 13, 2005, 10:37
|
|
Nope.
|
PMM
|
Re: hooray
Aug 13, 2005, 11:51
|
Yup. With the exception of Charles Webster Baer.
Unless you know differently of course.
|
PMM
|
Re: hooray
Aug 13, 2005, 11:55
|
Yup. With the exception of Charles Webster Baer.
Unless you know differently of course.
|
PMM
|
Re: hooray
Aug 13, 2005, 11:56
|
YUP. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF CHARLES WEBSTER BAER.
UNLESS YOU KNOW DIFFERENTLY OF COURSE.
|
PMM
|
Re: hooray
Aug 13, 2005, 12:24
|
- weren't people booted off here for being slightly less offensive than you?
- nope.
- Sure about that?
You asked a question. You were given an answer - that people aren't booted from this site for being offensive. You then questioned the answer. I reaffirmed the answer, but provided the only example I know of a person that was removed from the site.
I thought that since you couldn't accept the original answer to your original question, it may have been a rhetorical question, and you may know for certain of people that have indeed been "booted off here for being slightly less offensive than [lawrence]"
I hope that clarifies things for you manao.
|
Lawrence
|
Re: hooray
Aug 13, 2005, 13:20
|
|
You are really stupid!
|
Lawrence
|
Re: hooray
Aug 13, 2005, 13:21
|
|
You're not even half as clever as Quexalcote.
|
grufty jim
|
To manao
Aug 13, 2005, 14:11
|
manao, you are clearly 'lemon'.
I'm aware that lemon was banned from the site but only because I'm a friend of the admins here. I know nothing about the banning (was informed about it after the fact) and am actually completely ambivalent about it.
However, it was never announced publicly on this site (apologies to anyone if that was intentional and supposed to be kept quiet), so to know about it (as people like PMM and others *don't*) you would either have to be one of those banned, one of the admins, or a friend of one of them.
You're not the second or third of those. I've checked.
Also, arriving a few days after the banning, using a nick that means the same as one of those banned, using identical writing styles and phraseology as well as having a bee in your bonnet about bans that weren't made public and the "self-righteousness" of others, are all fairly obvious clues.
I assume they were deliberate. If they weren't then you're not very smart.
Now, it's of no interest to me whether or not you use this forum, either as lemon or manao or whatever else you want to call yourself. I made a decision a good while ago NOT to respond to any of your posts. It was when you called me a "self-important twat" if you're interested in the exact moment. That particular insult is what my old discourse lecturer (yes, I've actually studied "discourse" and "conversation theory" as part of a philosophy post-grad thang) would describe as an example of "aggressively terminating rational discourse". Insulting a person you are debating with always damages the efficacy of discourse. However there are certain insults which actually make discourse impossible.
Those include calling someone a "pathological liar" (you make it impossible for yourself to respond to any point being made as you have admitted the source is unreliable). But they also include telling someone that they are "self-important" as that makes response impossible ("I am not self-important" only reinforces the insult, but without countering it, a person places everything they say consequently in the debate within an unreliable framework - anything I say will be judged by you based not upon it's worth, but upon the fact that you distrust my motives).
So for this reason, I made the decision to cease responding to you. You rarely said anything *worth* responding to, of course, and when you did it was often counched in so much unpleasant aggression and delivered with such an obvious chip on your shoulder, that it was a difficult process at the best of times. Your habit of ignoring counters to your arguments and announcing that you'd somehow refuted the arguments of others by repeating the same unrelated and unsupported assertions was also quite silly.
As I say, I couldn't give a rat's arse whether you stay here lemon / manao. Really. I probably shan't be responding to anything further you say, but I was getting increasingly fed up with your cryptic remarks about people being banned and your claims that you aren't lemon. I mean, if you're lying about that... how do we know everything else you say isn't just bullshit too?
Now, feel free to have fun with your insults. I'm self-important and self-righteous and whatever else you want to call me. Go for it manao! Call a stranger some bad names. It must make you feel like such a big man.
|
