tiompan
|
Re: Stonehenge - dating the Y and Z holes
Dec 18, 2014, 18:46
|
|
Dave1982 wrote: But fraudulent behaviour, otherwise the organic remains are valid evidence -
Where does fraud come into it ?
|
Dave1982
|
Re: Stonehenge - dating the Y and Z holes
Dec 18, 2014, 18:47
|
'The evidence from the excavators . Why should it be discounted'
What evidence from the excavators ? Other than that already discounted ?
|
tiompan
|
Re: Stonehenge - dating the Y and Z holes
Dec 18, 2014, 18:48
|
|
Dave1982 wrote: Being a bit of a butcher is part of a successful soldier. So a professional surveyor was used.
What mistakes are these ?
Sadly not ideal for an archaeologist
As noted previously "It’s worth mentioning that David Field and Trevor Pearson in “Stonehenge Amesbury Survey Report pointed out that as Hawley did not provide decent co-ordinates some of the Y and Z positions in the north east are not quite right in the Cleal et al plans ."
|
Dave1982
|
Re: Stonehenge - dating the Y and Z holes
Dec 18, 2014, 18:49
|
|
Because if the organic evidence is valid, genuine, then the reindeer antlers dating is wrong, wrong, wronnnng !
|
tiompan
|
Re: Stonehenge - dating the Y and Z holes
Dec 18, 2014, 18:51
|
|
Dave1982 wrote: 'The evidence from the excavators . Why should it be discounted'
What evidence from the excavators ? Other than that already discounted ?
The evidence that the Z hole cuts the ramp and therefore predates the ramp . It has never been discounted to my knowledge , certainly not with any justification .
|
tiompan
|
Re: Stonehenge - dating the Y and Z holes
Dec 18, 2014, 18:51
|
|
Dave1982 wrote: With the ramps over the holes -
No ,the holes in the ramps .
|
Dave1982
|
Re: Stonehenge - dating the Y and Z holes
Dec 18, 2014, 18:52
|
'decent co-ordinates' ? This needs to be more precisely defined.
As previously post I have not been able to find that report, so am not able to respond.
|
tiompan
|
Re: Stonehenge - dating the Y and Z holes
Dec 18, 2014, 18:52
|
|
Dave1982 wrote: Because if the organic evidence is valid, genuine, then the reindeer antlers dating is wrong, wrong, wronnnng !
They were red deer .
Why are the dates wrong ?
|
tiompan
|
Re: Stonehenge - dating the Y and Z holes
Dec 18, 2014, 18:53
|
|
Dave1982 wrote: 'decent co-ordinates' ? This needs to be more precisely defined.
As previously post I have not been able to find that report, so am not able to respond.
The co-ordinates he presented were clearly wrong .
|
Dave1982
|
Re: Stonehenge - dating the Y and Z holes
Dec 18, 2014, 18:58
|
The dating of the holes - as you very well know ! : )
As in Red Herring Deer ? Thank you for the opportunity of making a well worn witty response, kind of you. : )
I'm off for a very late tea now - a pleasure to post with you, and I am really appreciative of your interest and analysis which has been invaluable to me.
Dave1982 : )
|
