Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Trethevy Quoit »
Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece
Log In to post a reply

Pages: 40 – [ Previous | 129 30 31 32 33 34 | Next ]
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
Harryshill
510 posts

Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece
Apr 02, 2013, 21:54
No more than you. Hell, buy the book then we can discuss it.
tiompan
tiompan
5758 posts

Re: Similarities elsewhere?
Apr 02, 2013, 21:55
thesweetcheat wrote:
That's fair enough and you've got the on-site experience I haven't.

But my question remains, is there not a simpler way the tomb could have got to how it is, without a major move-around of the stones being needed?

In most sciences, people would expect to test the simple explanations first and be prepared to dismiss them if they can be demonstrably shown to be wrong. That doesn't seem to have happened here and I can't help feeling that everyone is favouring the more complex theories because no-one wants to offend Roy or criticise his work. I get that, but if his theory is to be accepted in wider circles, it will need to stand up to much more scrutiny and analysis than my ham-fisted comments.


Errr you are not the only to criticise . I've been doing so from day one .
Littlestone
Littlestone
5386 posts

Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece
Apr 02, 2013, 21:55
I have the book. You do not, yet seem happy to say (without having read it) that you're already bored with it...
bladup
bladup
1986 posts

Re: Similarities elsewhere?
Apr 02, 2013, 21:56
The other quoits near it have stoneholes though for what that's worth, you can't help noticing how weird it looks at trethevy because they are just sat on the soil, there's not even a lowering over 5000 years, it does look very odd George, what it means i don't really know.
Harryshill
510 posts

Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece
Apr 02, 2013, 21:59
Littlestone wrote:
I have the book. You do not, yet seem happy to say (without having read it) that you're already bored with it...


Please don't put words in my mouth. ( your not very good at it) I am bored with this thread to the point I wouldn't buy the book.

Tedious, is a word that comes to mind. And you really don't help the cause.

Folk, if your interested, please buy Roys book.
harestonesdown
1067 posts

Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece
Apr 02, 2013, 22:04
Harryshill wrote:
Littlestone wrote:
I have the book. You do not, yet seem happy to say (without having read it) that you're already bored with it...


Please don't put words in my mouth. ( your not very good at it) I am bored with this thread to the point I wouldn't buy the book.

Tedious, is a word that comes to mind. And you really don't help the cause.

Folk, if your interested, please buy Roys book.



I'd say your opinion would be more valid if people had some idea who you are. Off hand i don't think i've seen any contributions by yourself ie pics posted, field notes etc or your general location etc. Added to your negativity on just about everything you come across as very troll like, imo.
Littlestone
Littlestone
5386 posts

Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece
Apr 02, 2013, 22:05
You said here that you wouldn’t be buying the book because you got bored with it already. How is that putting words in your mouth?
Littlestone
Littlestone
5386 posts

Re: Trethevy Quoit...Cornwall's Megalithic Masterpiece
Apr 02, 2013, 22:07
harestonesdown wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
Littlestone wrote:
I have the book. You do not, yet seem happy to say (without having read it) that you're already bored with it...


Please don't put words in my mouth. ( your not very good at it) I am bored with this thread to the point I wouldn't buy the book.

Tedious, is a word that comes to mind. And you really don't help the cause.

Folk, if your interested, please buy Roys book.



I'd say your opinion would be more valid if people had some idea who you are. Off hand i don't think i've seen any contributions by yourself ie pics posted, field notes etc or your general location etc. Added to your negativity on just about everything you come across as very troll like, imo.


Ditto again (or a sock puppet ;-)
thesweetcheat
thesweetcheat
6213 posts

Re: Similarities elsewhere?
Apr 02, 2013, 22:08
I know, you deserted me tonight though!
bladup
bladup
1986 posts

Re: Similarities elsewhere?
Apr 02, 2013, 22:09
tiompan wrote:
bladup wrote:
It's just the aesthetics really for me and the over laping with the stone next to it, and hardly anyone takes a photo from that side as it just doesn't look good/right, you must admit there's hardly any photo's of that side, just one really clear one on here for example, it looks wrong, and the way the capstone rests perfectly on the sidestone behind is odd as it not even meant to is it?


Some other overlapping sidestone ,sometimes it's just on one side .http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/site/2963/tirnoney.html
http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/site/1376/knockeen.html
http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/site/1817/poulnabrone.html
http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=6333405
If the backstone was in place then wouldn't it mean that the capstone was not resting on the sidestone ?


I can see it on them yes, not sure about Poulnabrone though as it's pretty flush, but to me the gap above the stone at Trethevy is way to big, the overlapping is something that does happen a lot [i did know this to be honest but couldn't think of anywhere] but trethevy seems a lot like Zennor and it's stones are pretty flush, Portal tombs and all there types are funny old beasts aren't they? i've always been a stone circle man but these places have grapped me since moving down here, very special places indeed.
Pages: 40 – [ Previous | 129 30 31 32 33 34 | Next ] Add a reply to this topic

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index