=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
The Long Man of Wilmington »
Long Man of Wilmington - URGENT HELP NEEDED
Log In to post a reply
196 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
VenerableBottyBurp
675 posts

Re: English Heritage Statement
Jul 06, 2007, 10:39
Stix wrote:
ENGLISH HERITAGE STATEMENT

Following an inspection of The Long Man of Wilmington in East Sussex (WED,) English Heritage believes that archaeological remains did not suffer any significant damage during the filming activities that took place there recently. During our visit we did note damage to the turf in some areas, which appears to be very recent and might have been caused during filming, and that two to four of the modern concrete blocks that delineate the head are missing, although we cannot say whether they were lost during the filming or whether they had been previously lost. In both cases the damage is superficial and can be repaired.


What a surprise that EH have missed the point. Whether or not there was direct damage from this fashion stunt, it encourages others to use this and other turf monuments to carry out similar stunts. The effects of that are twofold.

First off, as we have seen from the number of incidents in relation to other hill figures since the Big Brother episode at Uffington, this has become an increasing trait. Not all of these have sought permission, and a number of them have caused lasting damage. Approved stunts merely encourage and condone what inevitably leads to this damage.

Secondly, this trait is gratuitously showing disrespect for hill figures as monuments. Some are only a few years old, Uffington is prehistoric, but every single one means rather a lot to countless millions of individuals and thousands of groups. Hill figures are used as symbols of region and county, local and community identity. Shops and businesses are named after them, and of course many are venerated in historic and spiritual ways. They are monuments and as such are part of our historic environment. Is it then right that these symbols that are so cared for and expensively maintained should suffer degradation and insult even when this is so called harmless fun for charity, as in the case of the red nose day horse ?

We all know how the church reacted to the cyber game based on a cathedral, and we all recall the reaction of the authorities to a statue of Churchill getting a green paint punk hairdo. Is it not hypocritical to react like this whilst encouraging stunts in association with hill figures ?

That muesli, it just won't stop repeating on me...

VBB
In reply to:
Re: English Heritage Statement (Stix)		 Replies:
Re: English Heritage Statement (nigelswift)
Re: English Heritage Statement (Littlestone)
VBB Heritage paragraph. (Cursuswalker)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index