>If it came to a choice though, the Stonehenge archaeological landscape is more important than the wildlife I'd have thought.<
Ah, there I must respectfully disagree with you Nigel. Stonehenge, its attractions and its tourists will still be there in another 1000 years + while the stone curlew, and other endangered species, might not (and if push came to shove I think I'd rather throttle the tourists and save the curlews :-)