Moth
|
Re: Stone Shifting
Aug 26, 2003, 14:27
|
Not a bad idea Jim. In this case I wonder if Nigel could put a brief 'state of play' comment in his first post to bring people up to date?
love
Moth
|
jimit
|
Re: Stone Shifting
Aug 26, 2003, 14:32
|
|
Good idea :)
|
ocifant
|
Re: Stone Shifting
Aug 26, 2003, 14:39
|
<i>BTW Does anyone else think that this might be good etiquette to do this in future when a thread gets longer than, say, 100 replies?</i>
Cue another 15-20 posts agreeing with this idea...
(I agree, FWIW)
|
nigelswift
|
Re: Stone Shifting
Aug 26, 2003, 15:14
|
|
OK I'll start a continuation thread with a summary of this one, but it won't be immediately as even a summary is a bit complicated. So please keep posting to this in the meantime.
|
Moth
|
Re: Stone Shifting
Aug 26, 2003, 15:18
|
But then your summary'll be out of date. See, you'll have seen that I posted that & will have come in to see what it is.
Then someone'll say something sensible & you'll have to update your summary.
Sorry. I'll shut up.
love
Moth
|
nigelswift
|
Re: Stone Shifting
Aug 26, 2003, 15:48
|
Don't worry Moth, I'll start a Stoned Shitting thread, just for you.
(There now, you've even managed to dumb ME down. Do you work for Channel 5 ? )
|
Moth
|
Re: Stone Shifting
Aug 26, 2003, 15:59
|
Discovery channel.
love
M
|
nigelswift
|
Continued in Stoneshifting 2
Aug 26, 2003, 17:04
|
|
....
|
