The Modern Antiquarian Forum » Ritual Landscapes |
Log In to post a reply
|
|
|
Topic View: Flat | Threaded |
baza 1308 posts |
Aug 02, 2003, 14:54
|
||
Yesterday, I just happened to pass by my nearest henge, Condicote in Glos. There`s very little to see now :o( However, it has been excavated, and from the snails found, they deduce that it was situated in woodland. Another thing that I noticed, which is true of others, is that the ditch was dug six feet down *into the bedrock*. That makes me think that they *really* needed to have a ditch there. Unless `the tribe next door have got a henge so we`re going to have one, too.....whatever it takes.` baz
|
|||
Moth 5236 posts |
Aug 02, 2003, 14:55
|
||
Shut up Baz. I always end up looking like your 'yes' man. love Moth PS I didn't mean it about the 'boring' thing.
|
|||
FourWinds 10943 posts |
Aug 02, 2003, 15:37
|
||
... I reckon it's finished now :-)
|
|||
Moth 5236 posts |
Aug 02, 2003, 19:03
|
||
Bugger. Can't get hold of me mate with the scanner.... Soon though! love Moth
|
|||
BrigantesNation 1733 posts |
Aug 03, 2003, 00:14
|
||
I've just started reading Neolithic Britain and Ireland by Caroline Malone. In it she has a table showing chronology and features: 4000-3200BC - Wooded Landscape, causewayed enclosures, cursus monuments. 3200-2800BC - Semi Cleared landscapes, Enclosures, henges, avenues and alignments. 2800-2000 BC - Open Landscape, elaborate henges and stone circles, stone rows, avenues and pit alignments.
|
|||
baza 1308 posts |
Aug 04, 2003, 14:45
|
||
My current opinion, for what it`s worth, is that henges would be used for corralling livestock. How do you control livestock in wooded areas? Tether them all? Presumably, they`d have to gather them together, sometimes. The ditch inside the bank would prevent their escape. baz
|
|||
BrigantesNation 1733 posts |
Aug 04, 2003, 14:56
|
||
I don't agree, unless they had some pretty massive animals :o) you can keep a few animals in by building a fenced enclosure. There's no need for a ditch - a waste of effort - animals will quickly erode the sides and do themselves and injury in the process. A henge bank would similarly need a lot of maintenance to prevent it eroding to a point where animals can just stroll up it - sheep can climb hills steeper than you can make with loose earth. The design issues alone make a henge an impractical animal enclosure. The other option to keep animal coralled is of course - trees. I do think however, that some stone circles may be particulalrly ornate sheepfolds!
|
|||
Moth 5236 posts |
Aug 04, 2003, 15:34
|
||
I'm with you Brigantes (except on the 'sheepfold' theory). What advantage would a henge have over just a fence or stockade or something? love Moth
|
|||
BrigantesNation 1733 posts |
Aug 04, 2003, 15:49
|
||
No I'm talking (in a light hearted sort of way) about some particulalrly small "possibles" that I've seen. There are also possibly a couple of enclosures that I've seen that may have been henges that were converted into sheepfolds by filling in the gaps. There's a one by Reeth, at a place called Castle, which has a single stone in the centre and has a large number of orthostats in the roughly circular enclosure. I think of it a some sort of ritual enclosure linked with the mines. Shall I post it? When I first saw it I was not confident of my interpretation, I'm a lot more confident of an early date for this one now (not the henge bit though, since it's more of a banjo enclosure built of orthostats.).
|
|||
Moth 5236 posts |
Aug 04, 2003, 15:58
|
||
"...Shall I post it...." Well I'd like to see it, but I'm not sure if that's a criterion! love Moth
|
Pages: 14 – [ Previous | 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next ] | Add a reply to this topic |
|
|
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index |