anthonyqkiernan
|
Re: Mclusky
Jul 09, 2003, 16:59
|
|
Yeah, but they've replaced him and are having a we stint out at the start of August to exercise the new drummer. Not coming up here,though. Bastards.
|
mojojojo
|
You're right...
Jul 10, 2003, 18:55
|
|
..I do. But don't ignore this one. Let's get this going again - it's gonna fall of the page at this rate! (I think I've only mentioned LZ twice!).
|
Vybik Jon
|
Re: You're right...
Jul 11, 2003, 10:45
|
|
LZ? I've heard they suck big logs. I think we should have a thread on this topic. Anyone else?
|
anthonyqkiernan
|
144: Nah.
Jul 11, 2003, 11:03
|
|
They aint wurf it, Brian
|
mojojojo
|
|
yeah
In reply to:
144: Nah. (anthonyqkiernan) | |
Replies:
146 (mojojojo)
|
|
mojojojo
|
|
let's
In reply to:
145 (mojojojo) | |
Replies:
147 (mojojojo)
|
|
mojojojo
|
|
go!
In reply to:
146 (mojojojo) |
|
Nat Hate
|
Re: Led Zep suck logs
Jul 11, 2003, 11:34
|
|
Led Zeppelin couldn't even think of album titles until their fifth one. How amateur! Can you think of any sequence of albums that deserves the numerical titling method (eg Soft Machine - actually there's a big scope for odd album titles there!)
|
Vybik Jon
|
Re: Led Zep suck logs
Jul 11, 2003, 13:04
|
|
Peter Gabriel.
|
Nat Hate
|
Sequential album titles
Jul 11, 2003, 13:11
|
Here my alternative album titles for Led Zep I-IV
Led Zeppelin: White Man Blues
Led Zeppelin II: Sexual Squeaks
Led Zeppelin III: We Like Folk Too
Led Zeppelin IV/Four Symbols: Cock Rock in Smocks
Surely someone can think of better ones?
|
