tiompan
|
Edited May 08, 2016, 14:12
Re: John Michell lecture
May 08, 2016, 14:08
|
That was my initial thought too .
Hence "I thought the shadow was a Jungian reference .
Name calling saves providing an argument
|
cerrig
|
Re: John Michell lecture
May 08, 2016, 17:10
|
I would go to the site, and measure it with an instrument.
How do you do it remotely?
|
cerrig
|
Re: John Michell lecture
May 08, 2016, 17:11
|
|
Then why post it on this thread?
|
cerrig
|
Re: John Michell lecture
May 08, 2016, 17:17
|
|
This sounds very impressive George, but where do you get your figures from?
|
cerrig
|
Re: John Michell lecture
May 08, 2016, 17:35
|
You were right about that George. You do have this dark streak. That was it, nothing else. No hidden meanings really. When Nigel came back I just thought he was being Nigel. When Rhiannon also came back I had a look around the threads to see why they would make that connection.
I hadn't realised what a double act you are, but now I do.
|
cerrig
|
Re: John Michell lecture
May 08, 2016, 17:38
|
|
Wildlife is wonderful.
|
nigelswift
|
Re: John Michell lecture
May 08, 2016, 17:53
|
|
cerrig wrote: I hadn't realised what a double act you are, but now I do.
You mean I'm his shadow?
Amazingly, that's the fourth time.
Tangled web.
Now stop.
Lovely warm evening. Down to the Severn again.
|
tiompan
|
Re: John Michell lecture
May 08, 2016, 18:03
|
What type of instrument ?
Do you really not know how to measure the the alt from a given spot remotely ?
|
tiompan
|
Re: John Michell lecture
May 08, 2016, 18:10
|
|
Beacause it was related to number/ equidistances , joining up dots on map and believing it was something put together by the "ancients " .
|
tiompan
|
Re: John Michell lecture
May 08, 2016, 18:14
|
You have problem with being unable to face up to facts that are contrary to your beliefs .
Name calling, always comes easy to those who can never put up an argument .
|
