=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Silbury Hill »
Silbury Hill trespassers
Log In to post a reply
Pages: 30 – [ Previous | 1 … 25 26 27 28 29 30 ]
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
VBB
558 posts

Re: Silbury Hill trespassers
Jan 13, 2013, 08:41
harestonesdown wrote:
nigelswift wrote:


Personally, I would be against renovating and throwing open the main path as that would result in 500x more people going up and a commensurate increase in erosion.


I agree.
I guess it would throw up safety problems on the A4 too at busy times, both lay-bys are often full (WKLB and Silbury) so if the "proper" Silbury car park is full too people will pull up on the dodgy bend, i've witnessed it myself, along with people doing 3 point turns. ! eeeeekk.


"Eeeeekk" - that takes me back, I told you at the time if you don't like my driving then walk!
In reply to:
Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (harestonesdown)
VBB
558 posts

Re: Silbury Hill trespassers
Jan 13, 2013, 08:48
Sanctuary wrote:
Evergreen Dazed wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
The path wouldn't need to 'engage' with the monument at all points, it could snake.


It could indeed, nice idea.


I'll adder that to the suggestion list then :-)



Asp people not to climb and they'll wriggle out of it!
In reply to:
Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Sanctuary)		 Replies:
Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Sanctuary)
Sanctuary
Sanctuary
4670 posts

Re: Silbury Hill trespassers
Jan 13, 2013, 11:34
VBB wrote:
Sanctuary wrote:
Evergreen Dazed wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
The path wouldn't need to 'engage' with the monument at all points, it could snake.


It could indeed, nice idea.


I'll adder that to the suggestion list then :-)



Asp people not to climb and they'll wriggle out of it!


By talking with a forked tongue?
In reply to:
Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (VBB)		 Replies:
Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (VBB)
VBB
558 posts

Re: Silbury Hill trespassers
Jan 13, 2013, 15:38
Sanctuary wrote:
VBB wrote:
Sanctuary wrote:
Evergreen Dazed wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
The path wouldn't need to 'engage' with the monument at all points, it could snake.


It could indeed, nice idea.


I'll adder that to the suggestion list then :-)



Asp people not to climb and they'll wriggle out of it!


By talking with a forked tongue?



Rattling!
In reply to:
Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (Sanctuary)		 Replies:
Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (harestonesdown)
harestonesdown
1067 posts

Edited Jan 13, 2013, 22:04
Re: Silbury Hill trespassers
Jan 13, 2013, 22:03
VBB wrote:
Sanctuary wrote:
VBB wrote:
Sanctuary wrote:
Evergreen Dazed wrote:
Harryshill wrote:
The path wouldn't need to 'engage' with the monument at all points, it could snake.


It could indeed, nice idea.


I'll adder that to the suggestion list then :-)



Asp people not to climb and they'll wriggle out of it!


By talking with a forked tongue?



Rattling!



You don't half talk some cobras.
In reply to:
Re: Silbury Hill trespassers (VBB)
Pages: 30 – [ Previous | 1 … 25 26 27 28 29 30 ] Add a reply to this topic
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index