I don`t think that St. Peter's Church, Farnborough, should be on TMA.
It`s a church!
Okay, it`s on a mound. So what?
The only type of prehistoric, circular mound that I know of, in England, which can sometimes be found on the top of a hill, are round barrows.
How big is the base of the mound? It looks too big to be the remains of a round barrow, to my eyes.
Then there are the sarsen stones, apparently in the church, around the church and nearby to the church. That just says to me that there`s a lot of sarsen stones in the area which have not been utilised by prehistoric man or anyone since.
There doesn`t seem to be any evidence that it`s a prehistoric site. However, it *is* a church.
The Devil`s Hoofprint shouldn`t be on here, either. This is a site dedicated to prehistoric remains. Does anyone claim that the Devil`s Hoofprint is of prehistoric origin?
I don`t see any problem with discussing these unusual phenomena in the forum, but the site listings should remain true to the ethos of TMA.
Just my opinion. :o)
baz
|
