Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
'Sat-nav' 5,000 BC
Log In to post a reply

7 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
tiompan
tiompan
5758 posts

Re: 'Sat-nav' 5,000 BC
Sep 18, 2009, 20:43
baza wrote:
Amberlady wrote:
This is nothing new. Alfred Watkins postulated much the same thing in his book "The Old Straight Track" back in the 1930s....


No he didn't.

:o)

Tom Brooks has mapped out sites which he reckons to be opposite and equidistant from a central point, and that point in itself is very significant, e.g. Silbury Hill. I name Silbury Hill because he does, very often.

I saw Tom speak in Cumbria earlier in the year. He came across as a bitter man, railing against the many archaeologists who had no interest in his theories. He seemed to be unaware that there are others who have, and are still, researching along the same lines.

Later on, at Megalithomania, his DVD was showcased. I skipped it because I'd already heard what he had to say and was not impressed enough to bother.



http://www.mysteriousplanet.net/earth-mysteries.php


Pity there is no discussuion doodah on his web site .

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index