>> Get over this field boundary stuff. The site you link to was surveyed by Thom.
Hang on ... excavation report said ... "May be the remains of a field boundary"
Having a dig about is usually more reliable than simply surveying a site. What the report possibly missed is - May have been reused in a field boundary.
>> The test of whether a line containing stones is prehistoric, in the sense we would use it,
>> is whether it contains a 'significant stellar alignment'.
'THE' test? The one and only? Not really. I could show you several modern fences that have Equinox or Solstice alignments. A 'significant stellar alignment' would be just one very good indicator.
Sometimes a row of stones is just a row of stones ....
|