I agree that Arf's reviews are "funny" however I also agree that they're not really "reviews" at all. There's not enough there about the "music itself" to even indicate the guy has actually listened to the records.
I'm not criticising Holy's decision to delete reviews like that one. My problem is that I'm still not sure by what criteria that ELP review "should be deleted." Because of the band, the genre, or the way I wrote it?
I think all the reviews I've written so far fit the *current* guidelines written by Joanne Wilder and Julian . . . if the guidelines are going to change, I'd like to see what the new ones are before commenting on them.
I don't have any problem with the current guidelines and wouldn't change them. But obviously that's not my decision.
|