"People's Human Rights remain intact".
But where are the Human Rights of those who may be infected by those who opt to have no jab? Shouldn't "freedom" be constrained according to its effect, not be claimed as an absolute right? Freedom to speed past a school is hardly valid.
By the same token, people who wish to claim their freedom to have no vaccine should stay at home (and taking it to the nth degree, refuse to use NHS resources if the virus unluckily drifts through their window.)
Individual freedom v Society is one for the philosophers but I don't think they advocated anything but compromise.
|