Good point. One is always tempted to explain events according to ones ‘preferred’ narrative. So dare say it...evidence IS key. And the footage is being presented as ‘evidence.’ So it should be looked at..unbiasedly. No one can argue that the brightness of the day is/appears different..outside to inside.
If you’re suggesting by that that the footage has been cut or messed with by the media then that shows a lack of professionalism and disrespect to those affected for a ‘sensationalist’ story..or clear ‘footage’ from the scene. Maybe you meant the other link to the article. If anybody should know which churches were affected you’d have though a Christian organisation would?