nigelswift wrote: I await, with baited breath, to hear anyone explain how resticting immigration to a few tens of thousands ISN'T bad for the economy or deeply racist or both.
Well, today we have:
"Think tank Global Future, whose advisory council includes leaders from business, politics and the arts, says an absolute minimum level of 200,000 a year is essential to sustaining growth, stabilising the working age population and preventing severe staff shortages in a range of sectors, including the NHS."
So that confirms the fact it's bad for the economy. As for deeply racist, isn't there zero reason left to leave the low limit in place other than to give rampant racists what they want?
|