Head To Head
Log In
U-Know! Forum »
It seems to me
Log In to post a reply

119 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
2526 posts

Edited Feb 23, 2017, 14:43
Re: something else to sign
Feb 23, 2017, 14:41
drewbhoy wrote:
sanshee wrote:
drewbhoy wrote:

sanshee wrote:

As for 'unionist parties' though... they do have a spectrum of ideas on immigration and how to deal with child refugees.
It's a very unfortunate term that's polluting Scottish politics right now.
We can do without it, polarising, unhelpful, dishonest.
Sturgeon says she'll take one in, magic, that's only 349 to house;)
Oh Yvette Cooper too, so that makes it 348.
Let's not hold our breath though:(

Forgive me if I'm wrong, spoke to Eilidh Whiteford a couple of weeks ago and I had thought the intention was that Scotland would take them all of the children. To save children is never unhelpful imo and I know that is your opinion as well.

No, saving children isn't unhelpful, that would be an odd thing to think.
If you spoke to an MP and got it from them that the 350 are coming to Scotland then it must be true.
Haven't read that one though.
Is there an article or something saying so?

No that was just in conversation at a music for kids thing I was involved with. But will have a look for something more definite later.

This seems to be article that best describes it, the 350 was supposed to be the minimum and many thought and hoped that nearer 3,000 parentless/unaccompanied children would be taken to these shores.

Topic Outline:

U-Know! Forum Index