U-Know! Forum » Young, Nazi and Proud |
Log In to post a reply
|
|
|
Topic View: Flat | Threaded |
FourWinds 10943 posts |
Nov 05, 2002, 12:57
|
||
Well, evolution of language is great - hey! if it weren't for linguistic 'evolution' (or as I shall now call it "vole-crap") where would be today? Without vole-crap we would not be able to communicate as freely and as openly as we are able to here today. However! In a formal context, linguistic vole-crap should be disgarded and no colloquialism should ever be used - only dictionary definitions should be employed. The vole-crap of languages interferes and causes rifts and misunderstandings to occur in debate and formal contexts. While the use of locally vole-crapped words in a conversation amongst friends is fine, as each will have the same knowledge of the words in question. Didn't a bloke called Darwin write a best selling book on vole-crap?
|
|||
RiotGibbon 1527 posts |
Nov 05, 2002, 12:57
|
||
so, in other words, *any* word can mean *anything*, if enough people use it that way stop wriggling ... you've been busted, and you know it
|
|||
RiotGibbon 1527 posts |
Nov 05, 2002, 13:00
|
||
TV Guide TV Review Slagging off BNP bloke BNP Blokes sisters' tits Anti-fascist memory lane Roles of the police Mental illness Semantics NLP (didn't get very far with that one) Darwin Vole-crap excellent subversion, all pat yourselves on the back ..
|
|||
grufty jim 1978 posts |
Nov 05, 2002, 13:02
|
||
Saying: > > *any* word can mean *anything* > [full stop] > is very different from... > > so, in other words, *any* word can mean > *anything*, if enough people use it that way > which is precisely what i believe to be the case. Or do you have an alternative theory on how languages evolved and were created other than "enough people started using the same sound to represent an idea, and therefore bestowed it with meaning"? That's how i believe language works. I'd be interested to hear other theories (seriously)...
|
|||
FourWinds 10943 posts |
Nov 05, 2002, 13:03
|
||
"That doesn't mean that i can just decide today that "ride" means "to hunt caribou with obsidian arrows". The word means something very specific in those locations." Surely that's pretty close to the Irish meaning! I'm off to 'meet' a friend.
|
|||
lissy 202 posts |
Nov 05, 2002, 13:07
|
||
what mariella darwin the famous revolutionary volecrap thinker? she sucks man x ps VOLECRAP hahahhahahahahahah xxx
|
|||
lissy 202 posts |
Nov 05, 2002, 13:09
|
||
who are you today then rg? wicky spanker or nasally preventative ..
|
|||
grufty jim 1978 posts |
Nov 05, 2002, 13:12
|
||
What a loud of linguistic evolution!! By that token, FW, the word "gay" should have only been used to mean: "Showing or characterized by cheerfulness and lighthearted excitement; merry". right up until the day the dictionary* finally caught up with culture and included: "Of, relating to, or having a sexual orientation to persons of the same sex." Frankly, i believe the word "gay" completely changed meaning long before the dictionary caught up - to restrict "formal discussions" to an archaic mode of expression. To exclude "gay" because some editor in Oxford hasn't caught on to the cultural changes is... well, it's just so bloody Conservative (and conservative). * which dictionary, by the way? cos in case of the word "gay", they changed at different times... the Americans switching over first... i guess you'll have some British Colonial hangover that decrees the folks in Oxford should tell us all what we mean to say, right? ;->
|
|||
grufty jim 1978 posts |
Nov 05, 2002, 13:18
|
||
add to that the HH classic... "list-making". Wah-hey!
|
|||
FourWinds 10943 posts |
Nov 05, 2002, 13:24
|
||
I agree that in everyday conversation words should be used as they are used. It couldn't be simpler. However, in a formal situation they should not. It opens you up to ridicule and victimisation from picky wankers and anal retentives :-) And why does everybody use the word 'gay' as a counter example? If the gay community hadn't adopted it for themselves and it had remained a derogatory term you would be cursing its use. Think of another one ....
|
Pages: 7 – [ Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next ] | Add a reply to this topic |
|
|
U-Know! Forum Index |