Well, I've really got no horses in this race as should be clear. If you think the film was bullshit regarding causes of climate change, please help us all by pointing out where all those professors got it wrong. i.e. address the points in the film specifically r.e. CO2 vs sun activity theories. I'd genuinely like to here such arguements. Merrick totally failed to do this, resorting to selective cheap shots. An easy tactic in debate, but not a pretty one.
What I found most interesting was the way the film skewered the left and the right. Perhaps this is what is hurting peoples feelings as much as having a cherished belief (apparently) debunked... This may have been a deliberate ploy to raise as many hackles as possible.
|